2009 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (296 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 806 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (400 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 87 L |