2009 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (206 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 194 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A6 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2773 cc | 3966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |