2009 Audi A6 vs. 2006 BMW 323
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 230 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2006 BMW 323 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | 323 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |