2009 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi A6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (286 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A6 2013 Mazda 3
Make Audi Mazda
Model A6 3
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1896 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 128 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 286 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.5 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 91 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1535 kg 1303 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 55 L