2009 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1734 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (420 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | A6 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |