2009 Audi A8 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A8 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2009 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A8 (442 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A8 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A8 | EJ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 442 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |
