2009 Audi A8 vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A8 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2009 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A8 | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A8 | XJR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 90 L |