2009 Audi A8 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A8 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2009 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi A8 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A8 | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A8 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2350 mm |
