2009 Audi A8 vs. 1997 Bentley Turbo
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Bentley Turbo (396 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Audi A8. (256 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Bentley Turbo should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Bentley Turbo weights approximately 1235 kg more than 2009 Audi A8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Bentley Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Bentley Turbo (800 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A8. (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1997 Bentley Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A8.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A8 | 1997 Bentley Turbo | |
Make | Audi | Bentley |
Model | A8 | Turbo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 396 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 13.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 17.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 94 L |