2009 Audi A8 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A8 (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 370 kg more than 2009 Audi A8.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A8 (450 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A8 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A8 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 61 L |