2009 Audi A8 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Audi A8. (272 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A8 weights approximately 278 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.

Because 2009 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A8 (650 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (427 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang. 2009 Audi A8 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A8 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Audi Ford
Model A8 Mustang
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3936 cc 4606 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 272 HP 296 HP
Engine RPM 3750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 650 Nm 427 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 90.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1940 kg 1662 kg
Vehicle Length 5190 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 3080 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.6 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 59 L