2009 Audi Q5 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ

To start off, 2009 Audi Q5 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q5 (236 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q5 weights approximately 704 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q5 (450 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2009 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ. 2009 Audi Q5 has automatic transmission and 1953 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1953 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: