2009 Audi Q5 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2009 Audi Q5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q5 (208 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 2009 Audi Q5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi Q5 has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover 2000 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q5 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Audi | Rover |
| Model | Q5 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Top Speed | 222 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 54 L |
