2009 Audi Q5 vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Audi Q5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q5 (208 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (107 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Audi Q5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q5 | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Q5 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 107 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2510 mm |