2009 Audi Q5 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Audi Q5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q5 (208 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Audi Q5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi Q5 has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q5 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | Q5 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 222 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.2 seconds | 13 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |