2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (494 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Q7 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5934 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2605 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3300 mm |
