2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1962 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Audi Q7. (229 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 474 kg more than 1962 Jaguar MK X.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (500 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1962 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Q7 | MK X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1896 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.5 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 90 L |
