2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Q7 | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 81 L |
