2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Q7 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4132 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2420 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 79 L |
