2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (322 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Q7 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4133 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2420 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 95 L |
