2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (494 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 468 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1939 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | Q7 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5934 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2605 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |
