2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Q7 | Taunus |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3597 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |