2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1978 Datsun 260Z

To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 4,132 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (322 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1978 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (760 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 547 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 260Z.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi Q7 1978 Datsun 260Z
Make Audi Datsun
Model Q7 260Z
Year Released 2009 1978
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4132 cc 2565 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 322 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 3750 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 760 Nm 213 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 16.5:1 8.3:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline - Premium
Top Speed 236 km/hour 204 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 6.4 seconds 8 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2420 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4135 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]