2009 Audi Q7 vs. 1993 Rover 800
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 800 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (494 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1993 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1081 kg more than 1993 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Rover 800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 775 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 1993 Rover 800 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | Q7 | 800 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5934 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 1000 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 211 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2605 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |