2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (441 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2. 2009 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 2003 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2003 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | Q7 | C2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 41 L |