2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (350 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (441 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | Q7 | Safari |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 102 L |