2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3.

Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (441 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3. 2009 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi Q7 2004 Mazda 3
Make Audi Mazda
Model Q7 3
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 350 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 441 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 9.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 55 L