2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (237 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (550 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. 2009 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 2006 Daewoo Tocsa has manual transmission. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | Q7 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 550 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |