2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2008 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 Audi Q7 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 571 kg more than 2008 SsangYong Stavic.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 688 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2008 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | Q7 | Stavic |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5934 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 1000 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2605 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 80 L |