2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan

To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi Q7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi Q7 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Titan. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Titan.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi Q7. (441 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi Q7.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi Q7 2010 Nissan Titan
Make Audi Nissan
Model Q7 Titan
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 5551 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 350 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 441 Nm 522 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 12.5:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 5710 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1950 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 3560 mm
Fuel Consumption 13.1 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 19.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 106 L