2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi Q7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi Q7 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (494 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. (302 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | Q7 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5934 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |