2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi Q7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi Q7 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi Q7 (494 HP) has 223 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Because 2009 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jaguar XF. (600 Nm). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi Q7 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Q7 | XF |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5934 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 1000 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |
