2009 Audi Q7 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi Q7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi Q7 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Audi Q7. (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi Q7 weights approximately 757 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi Q7 (550 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo S60. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi Q7 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | Q7 | S60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2776 mm |