2009 Audi R8 vs. 1966 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi R8 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 1966 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Audi | Steyr |
Model | R8 | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 1510 mm |