2009 Audi R8 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | R8 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2380 mm |