2009 Audi R8 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi R8 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | R8 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 36 L |
