2009 Audi R8 vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 431 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | R8 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |