2009 Audi R8 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. Both 2009 Audi R8 and 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer are equipped with a 4,163 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1270 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | R8 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 95 L |