2009 Audi R8 vs. 2006 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (518 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2006 GMC Savana. (300 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Savana weights approximately 957 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 GMC Savana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Savana. (488 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 2006 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | R8 | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 5963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 488 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3940 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 117 L |