2009 Audi R8 vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (518 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2007 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (530 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | R8 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |