2009 Audi R8 vs. 2012 Ferrari 599
To start off, 2012 Ferrari 599 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi R8 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Ferrari 599 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ferrari 599 (611 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2009 Audi R8. (518 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ferrari 599 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi R8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ferrari 599 weights approximately 108 kg more than 2009 Audi R8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ferrari 599. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi R8 | 2012 Ferrari 599 | |
| Make | Audi | Ferrari |
| Model | R8 | 599 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 611 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1688 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4666 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1961 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1336 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 105 L |
