2009 Audi R8 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi R8 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2013 Lotus Evora. (276 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2013 Lotus Evora. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 491 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | R8 | Evora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |