2009 Audi R8 vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi R8 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (146 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 405 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (197 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi R8 | 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | R8 | Lancer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 10:01:00 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2635 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |