2009 Audi RS4 vs. 1946 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Audi RS4 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 156 kg more than 2009 Audi RS4.
Because 2009 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS4 | 1946 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS4 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1866 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3280 mm |