2009 Audi RS4 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Audi RS4 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS4 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS4 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | RS4 | RM A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |