2009 Audi RS4 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Audi RS4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS4 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS4 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | RS4 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |