2009 Audi RS4 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2009 Audi RS4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi RS4 (414 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS4 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi RS4 (430 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS4 | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | RS4 | Blazer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1638 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 71 L |