2009 Audi RS6 vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Audi RS6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 107 kg more than 2009 Audi RS6.
Because 2009 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi RS6 (650 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. (582 Nm). This means 2009 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi RS6 | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS6 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4991 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 572 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |
