2009 Audi RS6 vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Audi RS6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS6 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2009 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi RS6 | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | RS6 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4991 cc | 7446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 572 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2960 mm |
