2009 Audi RS6 vs. 1982 Bristol 412
To start off, 2009 Audi RS6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS6 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1982 Bristol 412.
Because 2009 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS6 | 1982 Bristol 412 | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | RS6 | 412 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4991 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 572 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2910 mm |